Dear list,
I already submitted a question about the differences between yin~ gbr.yin and pipo.yin in the MAX Sound Box group about the differences between the different yin implementations. I experimented with pipo.yin and it seems that the frequency values I get are not half as good as the real time values from the yin~ stand alone. It does not seem like I use very different parameters (I am looking at the frequencies using MIDI values). The quality (periodicity) values strike me as odd as well :
The mubu.process values:
----------begin_max5_patcher----------
643.3ocsTssbaCBD8Y4uBFd1QCRVWrxS4+noSGDZsMYj.M.x1oYx+dWPlZ2T
GOdRm9f.1iVXuc18sEIzV8QvRIOR9FII4sEIIAHOPxI4D5.+nnmaCpQE5gAP
4nKm+mCN5B34oD7WiSNf7pTQ5.qvHGcZiMppZZPO45AW3gXmPG4NwNoZ6OLf
vM6Hk0o4kEqZJWRxXUMoLbecXKOOkQ99oaJ6BFV29xC40QiXcu1CA7HxFsxs
gKBfqt.yJ+Y.KqHkc1CkpnCl4wdewB+xx6L4zN4bZ00C3rSnyPtWGg4nk1xU
ao+NptR9.i55OjOxKhqWKcrh84oi+4XTAGPa7W0+go1ozQiV.VKYGzO9fG4A
LJH7oNolX6kB3Qja7nUv6AxSJ9vLW4o30XgiaM3YLKgbIhT4WeJb2TeEijyJ
VGA1oGIkY4QQk1LPF0G.Ch3sQ5lIkfzq2Fka4VfjkxJaJpVEAkJLiPVmlUWV
2zbAJ+HhVUk0TVGQQ2xqL6RYTsrnrP2KUcvwyZf4aDz5UQp1nIamjjmoRkCL
dVIYXp2IOv2CKI1c7Qf.p8PudDkw6gQjtCHFtT0pO7LEeU9vXOX3Xe15pXU.
MJHzSpPoH+pzuhOi9QWN+I8M03w6kIlwJCclYU098UkWmKVUbmbw7u.Wj6bl
I4s6275DT9LIg9o4haF7EMWLWpdN5KY2ZtTc0WnQL7PgR5GFLG7IO9elQvdE
iHFAQqRN6O3nXmTwcRbxzYk70kKTZmrqCTWNXtSZ4s8PHXXWs1bu9iebz+O+
YNcwGG2CF6o2L3JHU4EcnzWuLHJUyhgWjZf8xn9UADtAK4NrdOYlKUGO0gQ8
MgFExzlKUnkeewu.jzwz4.
-----------end_max5_patcher-----------
For yin~ I use the standard settings (down: 2, lowest: 60, analyses: 5.)